That is the most frequent question I get when I tell people that I researched erotic photography. But in accordance with my co-workers and I, we would tell you 'No, it's definitely not porn.' And so would the photographers who take these kinds of pictures. And we would know. Because we asked them.
On a regular basis, erotica is material for the aim of arousing or titillating individuals. Porn, however, is for the reason of sexually arousing or gratifying individuals.
We used the term erotic photography because it captures a diverse range of work including boudoir, semi-nude, nude, sensual, erotic, and explicit. Some photographers preferred the term boudoir. It's French so obviously it sounds classy and boudoir conjures up images of lingerie and satin sheets versus penetrative sex.
But not only did we ask the photographers if erotic photography is the same as porn, we asked what a typical erotic photography photo shoot looks like, how it works, who their clients were (not their names, just general descriptors), and how the photographers create this sexually intimate atmosphere with clients.
So what does erotic photography look like? Well, it's usually women who have pictures taken for themselves. It could be a present for a partner (hello Santa) or possibly a gift purely for themselves. This was a serious difference among erotic photography and pornography.
If you beloved this article and you simply would like to get more info with regards to www.pornoscaserosxxx.com
i implore you to visit our web-page. In pornography, the end user (person looking at the photos/film) is just not usually the person within the pictures or film. But for erotic photography, usually the end user is featured within the pictures.
There is a certain 'je ne sais quoi' that differentiates these pictures from pornography... soft lighting, black and whites, softly focused or features of the shot that will be purposely out of focus, strategic shading, nakedness that's not full on crotch close-ups.
Another reason women had these photos taken: to document a time within their life. This could be at any time or maybe after a pregnancy or after a mastectomy. The coolest was when women were just feeling hot and wanted the photographs to prove it. For more on women that have these pictures taken, read Amy Muise's paper.
Few photographers shall take pictures of males. This is only because most photographers are not comfortable having a male client come into their studio to whack off on camera (well not right onto the camera...you determine what I mean) which is exactly what a lot of men want to do if it's a hot female photographer. Many photographers said they just did not find the male body that aesthetically pleasant to photograph - erection or no erection.
We spoke to one male photographer who does specialize in photography within the gay community and he said that many of his male clients also wanted to be captured in a beautiful way.
Sometimes couples came in and had photos taken together. Some photographers made them keep this PG-13, some photographers gave them the green light to do what ever the clients wanted - aka an 'interactive' erotic photography session.
What else was cool? There was no typical client. For the women...these were not all size 2 women who wanted to take sexy photos. Women were in their young 20s to the 60s, no typical body size, and ethnicities also varied. Too few men to generalize, sorry boyz.
Another misconception concerning this sort of photography is the fact that the photographers has to be perverts. Not true. Erotic photography was commonly a part of their larger photography business and it was vital for them to remain professional with their clients at all times (much more so than a typical portrait session due to the nakedness).